Freight
Environmental Contributions Of Some Customers Which Prefer Intermodal Transportation
| Customer | Payweight | CO2 Saving (kg) | Number of Trees Saved | Hectares of Forest Saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer A | 71.782.107 | 4.608.532 | 209.479 | 524 |
| Customer B | 29.727.664 | 1.908.566 | 86.753 | 217 |
| Customer C | 22.970.000 | 1.474.713 | 67.032 | 168 |
| Customer D | 18.620.000 | 1.195.435 | 54.338 | 136 |
| Customer E | 16.992.700 | 1.090.960 | 49.589 | 124 |
| Customer F | 11.793.400 | 757.156 | 34.416 | 86 |
| Customer G | 9.891.744 | 635.067 | 28.867 | 72 |
| Customer H | 9.590.777 | 615.744 | 27.988 | 70 |
| Customer I | 8.974.452 | 576.175 | 26.190 | 65 |
| Customer J | 8.609.700 | 552.757 | 25.125 | 63 |
- Only Intermodal Route Shipments of the customers are taken into account. Other saving from enviromental friendly routes (sea transportation, train transportation) have not been calculated.
- Time period for this calculation: October 2008 – August 2011
for all suggestions